More Strikes Against the Credibility of Fluoride Free NZ as Whakatane Councillors reconsider their decision

//More Strikes Against the Credibility of Fluoride Free NZ as Whakatane Councillors reconsider their decision

More Strikes Against the Credibility of Fluoride Free NZ as Whakatane Councillors reconsider their decision

For Immediate Release – 10 February 2016

WDC LogoTwo more rulings released today find Fluoride Free New Zealand is not a reliable source of information – and MSoF president Daniel Ryan is urging Whakatane District Councillors to pay
attention to the rulings when they revisit the issue of fluoridation tomorrow.

The decisions by the Advertising Standards Authority relate to an information leaflet distributed by fluoridation opponents during November’s referendum in Thames and to their newspaper advertising at the time.

The leaflet made a number of claims such as ‘fluoride is harmful to health’ and ‘fluoridation does not reduce dental decay’, which the ASA found to be misleading and alarmist, while parts of the newspaper ads were found to unjustifiably play on consumers’ fears.

‘Fluoride Free NZ has no qualms about spreading false information,’ says Ryan. ‘This is just the latest in an ongoing series of successful complaints against FFNZ which in fact currently ranks as the 12th worst organisation in NZ for successfully upheld or settled ASA complaints; quite an achievement when taking into account the small scale of their advertising.’

Ryan says it’s disturbing that before voting narrowly in late January to remove fluoridation in the Whakatane District Council water supply, one of only four parties invited to address the council was FFNZ.

‘FFNZ is simply not a reliable source. The Advertising Standards Authority is a neutral body and it has demonstrated that you don’t need to be a scientist to see when a statement is an opinion rather than a fact.’

‘It appears some of the councillors take FFNZ’s information at face value,’ Ryan adds. ‘To be fair, opponents are slick at making their information look convincing which makes it challenging for councillors. It’s why we and so many other public health advocates keep calling on central government to give responsibility for fluoridation to the Ministry of Health.’

Meanwhile, MSoF calls on Whakatane District Councillors to be mindful of today’s ASA decisions, along with the overwhelming scientific consensus on the safety and effectiveness of fluoridation, when they meet to reconsider their decision tomorrow.

Full ASA decisions:
http://msof.nz/wp-content/uploads/ASA-complaint-15470.pdf
http://www.asa.co.nz//backend/documents/2016/02/10/15503.pdf

For more information please contact:

Dr Ken Perrott
Science advertiser, MSoF
[email protected]

Daniel Ryan
President, MSoF
[email protected]

By | 2016-10-20T09:15:59+00:00 February 10th, 2016|Categories: Media|Tags: , , , , |3 Comments

About the Author:

Daniel Ryan is from Wellington and works as a developer lead at CricHQ. He is a co-founder and president of Making Sense of Fluoride, a technical lead/committee member for the NZ Skeptics and a co-founder of the Society for Science Based Healthcare. He also spends his free time carrying out skeptical activism. Contact email: [email protected]

3 Comments

  1. Steve Slott February 11, 2016 at 1:17 am - Reply

    Daniel, you think maybe we could extend the ASA’s jurisdiction to include the US? On a 1-10 scale of difficulty, 10 being the most, finding anything accurate in information disseminated by antifluoridationists and their little groups hovers around 12.

    Steven D. Slott, DDS

    • Daniel Ryan February 11, 2016 at 10:51 am - Reply

      Sounds like you want to push for the US to setup its own ASA. The UK has an ASA of their own.
      Probably won’t be easy, and I have no idea how would you even try attempt that.

  2. Steve Slott February 11, 2016 at 11:39 am - Reply

    Nah, I was just kidding. We have laws against false advertising….getting them enforced is another thing. It would be far too cumbersome to go through the legalities and bureaucracy it would take to get them enforced against some group like FAN and its minions. The best we can do is to keep educating with proper information every time their misinformation shows up anywhere. We’re making good progress against their nonsense, which is frustrating them to no end.

Leave a Reply