Comments on: Discussion – Compulsory Water Fluoridation: Second Response To Rita Barnett-rose https://msof.nz/2014/10/discussion-compulsory-water-fluoridation-second-response-to-rita-barnett-rose/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=discussion-compulsory-water-fluoridation-second-response-to-rita-barnett-rose Looking at the science and countering the misinformation on fluoridation Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:16:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: Daniel Ryan https://msof.nz/2014/10/discussion-compulsory-water-fluoridation-second-response-to-rita-barnett-rose/#comment-6 Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:14:41 +0000 http://msof.nz/?p=290#comment-6 In reply to soundhill1.

Have a read of my first reply:
http://msof.nz/2014/09/compulsory-water-fluoridation-a-response-to-rita-barnett-rose-discussion/

Or you might be interested in:
http://msof.nz/2014/02/a-look-into-osteosarcoma/

]]> By: soundhill1 https://msof.nz/2014/10/discussion-compulsory-water-fluoridation-second-response-to-rita-barnett-rose/#comment-5 Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:05:37 +0000 http://msof.nz/?p=290#comment-5 I came here to look for a reference to a systematic review of studies on cancer site in the body, male vs female, and fluoride levels at those appropriate to fluoridation. Typing in “systematic” brought me to this article.

]]>