Yep, it is now linked to Harvard Univiersity!

Obviously Kane is on good terms with this guy.

But what about publicly dissacociating from the content of that page – the abuse and libel of councillors. Surely FFNZ should be up to that – unless they find such dog whistling support for their cause handy.

Great. As Dan said, please don’t hesitate to get in contact if you need anything.

After a few successes in Michigan and Kansas we’re more than happy to extend some support to our friends in the United States.

“He isn’t a part of FFNZ and I have asked him to remove our links. End of story.”
Thank you Kane.

Oh dear, another evidence free rant.

Rhetoric is doing you no benefit, Trevor.

The About section on that page no longer contains the link you are talking about. That person is saying a lot of things that we have refuted ie Nazi myth being one example. He isn’t a part of FFNZ and I have asked him to remove our links. End of story.

Kane – this reminds me of the sillyness over Vinney Edwards and his libellous video attack on me. I asked Mary to stop promoting it and to reprimand him. She said he was not a FFNZ member. But of course no-one is a FFNZ member – there isn’t a formal membership. Very handy.

I then asked her to dissociate FFNZ from the attack – she refused.

And of course FFNZ went on promoting the video and maintain their assocaition with that nutter.

The person promoting the Turangi page and petition certianly sees himself as part of FFNZ – whatever you say.

His “about section” can be seen as implying that the formation of his page was part of the start of the FFNZ campaign in the Taupo region. And the absence of any other FFNZ Taupo/Turangi page supports that.

So, Kane, is FFNZ prepared to publicly dissociate itself from the Turangi page because of its abusive and libellous content?

Is FFNZ prepared to publicly condemn those methods?

And is FFNZ prepared to publicly ask him to remove the link to FFNZ, with its implication of being part of the organisation?

Until FFNZ does I will intepret your silence as accepting that he is part of your movement (even if informally), associated with your organisation (even if informally), and that you are condoning his attacks by your silence.

“Is this page not public?”
Of course it is. But you haven’t asked in here for them to take it down. But anyone on that page wouldn’t see these comments anyway.
Just giving tips if you actually wanted to distance yourself from them, otherwise feel free to ignore my advice.

Is this page not public?

Wouldn’t you want to contact them and say take it down? If you did it publicly then people know you’re not part of that group even if they didn’t take it down.